Error or Accounting estimate
Error or Accounting estimate
Hi,
I have one question
In case where a company failed to accrue for a professional fee in the prior year (example an audit fee for the prior year where the audit was executed in the current year) and paid the fee when due in the current year. Should the company restate the prior year figures as error committed for the professional fee or should account the fee in the current year as change in estimate?
I have one question
In case where a company failed to accrue for a professional fee in the prior year (example an audit fee for the prior year where the audit was executed in the current year) and paid the fee when due in the current year. Should the company restate the prior year figures as error committed for the professional fee or should account the fee in the current year as change in estimate?
Re: Error or Accounting estimate
Did you know, at the balance sheet date, that an audit of that period's results would be requested? (If it's a mandatory audit then clearly the answer is yes).
Re: Error or Accounting estimate
Thank you.
Though it is not legally mandatory, it is a common practice to file audited financial statements to the tax office.
Though it is not legally mandatory, it is a common practice to file audited financial statements to the tax office.
Re: Error or Accounting estimate
did you engage an auditor before the year end
Re: Error or Accounting estimate
No. Usually, the auditors don’t perform an interim audit and the engagement letter is signed after the year end. However, as said before it is a usual practice to have the accounts audited.
Re: Error or Accounting estimate
I can't believe an audit fee, or similar fee, is material, so it's not restatement territory but as to the precise correct answer, you can make a judgement.
Re: Error or Accounting estimate
Thank you for the invaluable advice.
Re: Error or Accounting estimate
ha! this is the exact topic discussed some time ago:
viewtopic.php?f=6&t=461
IMO, there should be no accrual at year-end if no audit work was performed
viewtopic.php?f=6&t=461
IMO, there should be no accrual at year-end if no audit work was performed
Re: Error or Accounting estimate
For avoidance of doubt, (and I hope this is consistent with what I said in the other thread!), if it was known (or required) as at the year end that an audit would happen then I think an estimate of the cost should be accrued.
Re: Error or Accounting estimate
Yes, your view is clear, but I disagree
As I see it, you're proposing to recognise an expense for a service just because you know you need to buy it in the future. But at the year end, you don't have any obligation towards the auditors to pay the audit fee
As I see it, you're proposing to recognise an expense for a service just because you know you need to buy it in the future. But at the year end, you don't have any obligation towards the auditors to pay the audit fee
Re: Error or Accounting estimate
I guess it's the combination of the fact that an audit is legally required (let's assume), in respect of that specific accounting period, so in some sense an obligation that should be reflected in the numbers being put in front of users.
Re: Error or Accounting estimate
But the obligation is to buy the audit service in the next accounting period, so there is no obligation and no service actually delivered at the end of the current accounting period
Re: Error or Accounting estimate
I don't think the obligation is allocated to any time period in particular, other than it relates to the year being audited. so that's the year the obligation arises in respect of.
Re: Error or Accounting estimate
I guess we need to agree to differ on this one
Re: Error or Accounting estimate
Yep - same as last time! Maybe one day Interpretations Committee can rule - I guess it's a Conceptual Framework question.....
Re: Error or Accounting estimate
My two cents' worth: if an engagement letter is not signed, and no audit work has been performed, recognising an expense does not seem correct.
Re: Error or Accounting estimate
ha, 'no expense' team is winning 2:1
Re: Error or Accounting estimate
I did ask "did you engage an auditor before the year end" as I agree that's a consideration
Re: Error or Accounting estimate
mere "engagement" is just an executory contract that is not recognised in FS
the valid question is whether the audit service was (at least partially) performed
the valid question is whether the audit service was (at least partially) performed
Re: Error or Accounting estimate
I don't mean an engagement letter being signed and therefore giving rise to a contractual liability.
I also don't think actual performance is relevant to my argument. You would recognise 10% of the expected cost if 10% of the audit was performed by year end?
I think it's a special case because of how closely tied (ie perfectly tied) to the financial statements this specific service is.
I also don't think actual performance is relevant to my argument. You would recognise 10% of the expected cost if 10% of the audit was performed by year end?
I think it's a special case because of how closely tied (ie perfectly tied) to the financial statements this specific service is.
Re: Error or Accounting estimate
Technically I would recognise 10% of the fee if I could assess that only 10% of the work is done, but of course that's hard to assess and I understand that for audits that are significantly advanced before the reporting date, you recognise 100% as a practical expedient with immaterial impact
but if the audit hasn't even started, then I would not recognise anything, it would be recognising future expenses IMO. It doesn't matter that the future service is "tied" to particular period.
I think that Example 6 Legal requirement to fit smoke filters from IAS 37 can be a good analogy, hm?
but if the audit hasn't even started, then I would not recognise anything, it would be recognising future expenses IMO. It doesn't matter that the future service is "tied" to particular period.
I think that Example 6 Legal requirement to fit smoke filters from IAS 37 can be a good analogy, hm?